In this blog, I explore an alternative
approach to composing atonal music. This
technique uses ‘strange circles’ as sources of notes for a musical
composition. Strange circles are
representations of musical notes that we have discovered in many networks that
we have trained on musical classification problems.
First, I will briefly state what strange
circles are. Then, I will explain how I
used them to generate the notes of a musical score. I am going to provide that musical score, and
also provide some sound files that illustrate the completed piece, as well as
the components from which it was constructed.
If you are not interested in the details of my method, then feel free to
skip to the end to hear its results! (Links are in the text, but are not evident in some browsers. So, I have also set aside the links at the end of this post.)
Strange
Circles
Most students of music encounter a device
called the circle of fifths. It arranges
all twelve notes from Western music in a single circle; adjacent notes in this
circle are a musical interval of a perfect fifth (or seven semitones)
apart. This circle helps determine the
number of sharps or flats in a key signature, or guides chord progressions in
jazz.
The Circle of Fifths
Other circular arrangements of notes are
possible that separate adjacent notes using musical intervals different from
the perfect fifth. These are ‘strange
circles’ because they are not typically taught to music students. When my students and I train artificial
neural networks to classify musical chords, and then examine the internal
structure of the trained network, we often find that the network assigns notes
to a variety of strange circles.
For example, we often find that networks
employ two circles of major seconds, both shown below. In each of these circles, adjacent notes are
a major second (or two semitones) apart.
With this separation between notes, one circle captures half the notes
in Western music, and the other captures the other six notes.
Two Circles of Major Seconds
We also frequently discover the four circles
of major thirds in our networks; all four appear below. In each of these circles, adjacent notes are
a major third (or four semitones) apart.
With this separation between notes, one circle only captures a quarter
of the notes in Western music. As a
result, four difference circles are required to represent all of the possible
notes.
Four Circles of Major Thirds
Composing
With Strange Circles
Why do networks use strange circles to
represent musical structure? One reason
is that networks discover that notes that belong to the same strange
circle are not typically used together to solve musical problems, such as
classifying a musical chord. Instead,
the network discovers that combining notes from different strange
circles is more successful.
I thought that a network’s approach to strange
circles could create new music. Networks
combine notes from different strange circles, but do not expect notes from the
same strange circle to co-occur. What if
the notes for a voice or a staff of a musical composition were provided by a
strange circle? If one created this
voice by choosing only one note at a time from a strange circle, then its notes
would not co-occur. However, if one used
different strange circles in this way to create different voices in the same
composition, then this might be musically interesting.
My hypothesis led to action. I created a six-voice piece of music, in
which a strange circle provided the notes of each voice. I used each of the six strange circles illustrated
above. To choose a note for a staff, I
randomly selected a note from its strange circle. (This move is also consistent with our
network interpretations: networks treat each note from the same strange circle
as being exactly the same note!)
I made three additional musical
assumptions. First, while each wheel
generated a note name, I decided how high or low (in terms of octave) each note
was positioned. Second, I added a rest
to each circle, so that at a randomly selected moment any strange circle could
be silent. This was to provide some
musical variety. Third, in order to ensure
that all notes occurred equally often in the score, I sampled the two circles
of major seconds twice as frequently relative to the other four strange
circles. That is, I used the circles of
major seconds to generate four quarter notes per bar, while the other four circles
were used to generate two half notes per bar. The score generated from the
‘strange circles’ in this fashion consisted of 14 bars. Its first four bars are below; a pdf of the entire score is available here.
Individually, the strange circles are not musically
interesting, though they do seem musical.
For instance, listen here to a single circle of major thirds. There is not much you can do using only three
notes and the occasional rest! You can
also listen here to a single circle of major seconds. It is a bit more interesting, because it uses
six different notes.
Music that is more interesting emerges from
combining the random outputs of different circles. I enjoyed the results of pairing the two
circles of major seconds together, which you can hear here. Combining two circles of major thirds also
shows promise, as you can hear; even more interesting results result from
combining all four circles of major thirds.
Of course, the full composition involvescombining the notes of all six circles simultaneously. I was surprised at its musicality. My impression of this piece was that it is a
modern, atonal composition. I am no Schoenberg,
but I humbly submit that composing music by combining strange circles provides
an interesting and alternative method to dodecaphony.
Links
Links
How do you define "musicality? | And if a work is not atonal, is it not modern - even if it has been recently composed?
ReplyDeleteI can understand exploring sounds and how they fit together. But is this kind of music really aurally interesting? Or is it that it is simply aurally incomprehensible, and we are drawn to it just because we so desperately need to discern some kind of pattern that we can latch on to? Why do composers really compose atonal music?
If I take a chair apart, and rebuild it according to some new original design so that in the end it neither looks like a chair nor can hold weight, is it still a chair?
I would imagine that judging the musicality of a piece requires listening to it, and then evaluating it according to one's own criteria. You can do so too -- that is why I provided the audio files with this post.
DeleteAn interesting piece; the notes appearance on the page are intriguing. But if I close my eyes, I hear something else. A fascinating subject.
ReplyDeleteInteresting method. Although it seems to me that combining multiple sets of circles in your composition provides a much less controlled result than only using circles of a single interval between voices which would allow you to 'filter out' certain intervals (M2/m7 if you use the two circles of M2) and focus more on specific sounds during the aleatoric process. Which may or may not be what you are after. You could also potentially enhance the method by adding more restricting parameters to the selection process (like the rest) and/or alternating circle types, using non-symmetrical circles etc..
ReplyDeleteIn any case, great stuff :)